The Drydock - Episode 163

From the creator

00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:37 - Would the Tillman designs and other 20' armed ships actually have become a legitimate ship built and used had it not been for the Washington and London naval treaties? 00:03:16 - What is your favorite warship that served in WWII that is NOT from the 5 washington treaty signers (including RCN and RAN as kinda "part" of RN) nor from Germany? 00:05:27 - Can you sum up the damages HMS Vailant received when her drydock collapsed in 43? 00:07:46 - Were armored conning towers ever a good idea? 00:12:23 - When did it beome generally illegal to mount military grade wrapons on a private vessel? 00:18:02 - Is it possible to convert a distributed armour scheme to an all-or-nothing scheme? Were all-or-nothing schemes considered by Britain and Germany for their Dreadnoughts/battle cruisers pre the launch of the Nevada class? 00:22:39 - What is you favorite heroic act of an individual serving on a warship? 00:25:16 - In the run up to WW1 Germany decides not to try to match the British Grand Fleet and instead just builds a small costal defense fleet. Is there anything the Royal Navy could do to significantly impact the outcome now that it doesn't have a large enemy fleet to worry about? 00:28:23 - Why did nations not just totally cheat or just walk away from The Washington Naval Treaty - who was going to say you cheating and enforce the rules? 00:34:30 - What under the treaties counted as disarming/decommissioning/rendering no longer war like, a s

Published 2021-09-12 · Watch on YouTube ↗
Availability and playback restrictions are controlled by the original channel.