Someone improved my code by 40,832,277,770%

From the creator

YES, the improvement should be 40,832,277,770%, not what I say in the video. The "408,322,778" multiple was correct and I did the percentage the wrong way. There will not be a follow-up video to correct that. The improvement was to my code from this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-AfhLQfb6w This is episode 038 of the A Problem Squared podcast which started it all: https://aproblemsquared.libsyn.com/038-fldxt-in-wordle-and-improv-tact-hurdle Here is Benjamin Paaßen's full grid of all results and techniques used. It also has links to all the code as well. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11sUBkPSEhbGx2K8ah6WbGV62P8ii5l5vVeMpkzk17PI/edit#gid=0 The article by "encody" I mentioned: https://medium.com/geeklaunch/how-to-speed-up-your-code-224-444-739-using-graphs-cc37dc395c0c This is the reverse-frequency alphabet. Which is frequency in words, not in use (which would allow for frequency of word use; this list counts each word once). QXJZVFWBKGPMHDCYTLNUROISEA And whynot, a whole bunch of code. All of it is better than mine. All of it. (Even if you ran it all sequentially.) Benjamin Paassen [bpaassen] https://gitlab.com/bpaassen/five_clique Sylvester Hesp [oisyn] https://github.com/oisyn/parkerwords Phire [phire] https://github.com/phire/five_clique Neil Coffey [neilcoffey] https://github.com/neilcoffey/FunStuff/tree/main/WordleFiveWordFinder Richard Ebeling [He3lixxx] https://github.com/He3lixxx/five-words-five-letters Phillip Alday [palday] https://github.com/

Published 2022-10-17 · Watch on YouTube ↗
Availability and playback restrictions are controlled by the original channel.