Ask GN 57: Chipped GPU, Pascal Temperature Response

From the creator

This episode of Ask GN (#57) discusses tech battlescars, CUDA vs. CPU for Premiere, Pascal temp response, and more. Ad: EVGA 1080 Ti SC2 w/ Destiny 2 on Amazon https://goo.gl/gAi53Y (buy from Amazon with this link) GN store: https://gamersnexus.squarespace.com/ Like our content? Please consider becoming our Patron to support us: http://www.patreon.com/gamersnexus Timestamps: 01:43 - Pascal Temperature Response 03:47 - Bence Koczogh: "Ask GN: I chipped the corner of my GTX 1050Ti's GP107 core. It still works, but how? Will it just randomly die on me? I swear I saw transistor in the "removed" corner. FYI, it was the top right corner." 09:25 - Scooby Dooby (Discord): "@Steve Burke Your latest video talks about a use case scenario you found for Threadripper: production compression. In it you mention how AMD's PR department couldn't give you straight answers about Ryzen's ideal use case scenario's due to a lack of communication with their technical people. (While I don't expect PR people to be tech experts, this seems to be a huge oversight on AMD's part...) Anyway, you point out that in Blender and Adobe Premier that CUDA acceleration is faster, MUCH faster in fact, making a powerful CPU rather redundant. Even including the CUDA render times with a 7600K in your graphs to prove a point. Now, another Tech Tube channel I watch keeps saying that his videos don't include a lot of "effects" and so he doesn't benefit from CUDA acceleration as much, making a strong case for using a

Published 2017-08-26 · Watch on YouTube ↗
Availability and playback restrictions are controlled by the original channel.